2019-03-01
As an important model for purchasing demand in large second-hand excavator equipmentHow should we choose between 350 and 360? Choosing large equipment not only requires weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each brand, but also dividing the focus based on the environment of the equipment usage area. Some important equipment cannot meet the efficiency requirements in high-altitude or construction environments, especially in high-altitude areas where excavator efficiency is extremely high. Generally, equipment that cannot meet fuel efficiency requirements may not be able to function properly or encounter various unexpected situations during use. Below, we will recommend several mainstream construction recommendations for large excavators.
CATThe 336 excavator, as the most adaptable machinery among large equipment, has satisfactory performance in practical power and daily use efficiency. CAT is not picky about working environments, and it is equally suitable for both plateau and plain environments. Purchasing CAT also requires a certain level of economic strength, and both new and second-hand excavators are far superior to similar models.
Komatsu360 and 350 belong to the same model, with consistent internal and external structures that distinguish them from imported and joint venture models. They have a high usage rate in China and have a good reputation for speed and efficiency in daily use. Daily maintenance is relatively simple, and the current market price is reasonable. However, before choosing old equipment in China, it is necessary to understand the machinery.
HitachiThe 350 series, as a mainstream direct injection machine, has a large number of loyal customers in China. Its high efficiency, stability, and operability in daily use have made Hitachi very popular. Its pricing in the second-hand excavator market generally ranges from 500000 to 700000 yuan. Hitachi's main advantage lies in its excellent use of large equipment, which has generally improved its oil leakage and seepage situation in the past.
As for Kobelco, the last high praise in China is still the Bumblebee series imported from Japan. The yellow high-speed engine has excellent fuel saving performance, which is truly impressive. The comprehensive performance of the power system and performance of the whole machine has extremely high quality, and the price is currently slightly higher than the domestic joint venture version model. Recommended for earthwork or general large-scale construction projects, not recommended for construction units with high loads and pressures.
VolvoThe time span of 360 is large, and the quality of equipment varies. When choosing, it is necessary to purchase from large markets to avoid buying inferior machines as good ones. Volvo's advanced electronic fuel injection engine technology significantly saves fuel consumption. Through multiple communications with customers, the equipment has been in working condition for a long time, and the annual average fuel saving cost ranges from 30000 to 60000 yuan, which is also a considerable cost savings. Speed is also Volvo's expertise in mechanical practicality, making it suitable for various harsh environments and high-altitude areas.
There are not many skills involved in choosing large equipment. It is important to have a common sense understanding of the equipment or to have a thorough understanding of the actual usage and performance of second-hand excavators. Purchasing equipment based on its past construction environment or original usage has certain reference value.
Send your inquiry directly to us
